Dear Mortals · DM-002

What would be enough for now?

Four questions for examining a desire without judging it.

In an ordinary stressful or anxious moment, a desire can arrive with no visible stopping point: obtain more, preserve more, upgrade more, prove more.

Epicurus distinguishes natural and necessary desires, natural but unnecessary desires, and desires grounded in empty or illusory opinion. The categories are inquiries, not moral grades.

The Principal Doctrines ask whether fame and status actually deliver the security sought. Separately, they contrast limited natural wealth with wants driven by groundless opinion. That is not a condemnation of ambition, work, money, or public life. It is an invitation to examine the job assigned to the desired object.

A modern editorial experiment

Ask four questions

  1. What do I want, in one sentence?
  2. What concrete need or expectation sits beneath it?
  3. What would be sufficient for now, not forever?
  4. What one modest action or source of support follows?

Do not use these questions to talk yourself out of safety, care, food, housing, medicine, support, or justice. Material hardship and genuine needs remain real.

The point is not wanting less. It is seeing whether the desired object has been assigned a job it cannot reliably do.

Epicurus, Letter to Menoeceus 127; Principal Doctrines 7, 15, 21, 29-30; Hicks anchor desk-compared with Bailey, Inwood/Gerson, and Mensch

The four-question practice is a modern Mortal Commons editorial experiment informed by those passages. Research only: the desk comparison is complete, but independent specialist review remains required. Educational material, not medical, mental-health, dietary, or financial advice.